all news
Daily news Posts

MC USA Board approves Journey Forward, Appointment of LGBTQ member reaffirmed

10.2. 2017 Written By: Paul Schrag, Mennonite World Review 2,962 Times read

Photo: Mennonite Church USA Executive Board members (from l to r) Larry Hauder, Michelle Dula and Margie Mejia-Caraballo. Photo by Paul Schrag/Mennonite World Review. 

First was the Future Church Summit. Next comes the Journey Forward.

The Mennonite Church USA Executive Board on Sept. 30 approved a plan to make the summit the starting point of a two-year process to shape the denomination’s future.

The summit, held over 14 hours during the MC USA convention July 4-8 in Orlando, Fla., generated a nine-page document listing ideas, beliefs and visions. Delegates decided to call it “a dynamic document…to guide further discernment.”

Members of the Executive Board set the discernment process in motion at their Sept. 28-30 meeting in Kansas City. They approved Journey Forward—a vision-and-values statement and a plan to encourage the denomination’s 625 congregations and 69,000 members to study it and give input to develop it further.

The process is envisioned as a denomination-wide effort to create a new vision and identity document, based on themes that emerged from the Future Church Summit, for delegates to test and discuss at the 2019 convention.

Goals include to “renew our commitment to being together in our differences, build greater trust among us and unify us with clearly discerned identity, vision and values as Anabaptists in the 21st century.”

Between April and December of 2018, each MC USA congregation will receive a “Journey Forward: Embracing God’s Hope” document and study guide. A survey will be written to gather responses from congregations, with all input due by the end of the 2018.

During discussion of the Journey Forward proposal, board member Leslie Francisco of Hampton, Virginia, urged special attention to Millennials and Generation X individuals and to bridging divisions in the church.

“Can we emphasize being good neighbors rather than adversaries?” he asked. “Can we say we are in this together, as Christ is the center and we all reach toward that center?”

A one-page Journey Forward summary includes three statements of vision and core values. It says MC USA is:

    • Grounded in the whole story of Jesus. We live out our faith in radical discipleship to Christ.
    • Transformed by the Holy Spirit in community. We share our lives together as a reflection of the fullness of God’s love and welcome to all people in diverse communities.
    • Empowered to do God’s reconciling work. We extend healing and hope by witnessing to God’s vision of shalom for all creation and standing with the marginalized through truth and action.

Executive director Ervin Stutzman observed that some have asked if the Journey Forward statement might replace the Membership Guidelines, which delegates reaffirmed in 2015 and could re-evaluate as early as 2019.

“At this point, we are not prepared to answer that question,” he wrote in his report to the Executive Board. “But we can say that we are beginning to work on a new guiding process for the church, and we’ll see where that leads us. And it’s OK to signal it could replace the guidelines, but we need the congregational study and the feedback to help us determine that.”

Appointment reapproved

Working in two closed sessions, the board decided that Doug Basinger, a man in a same-sex marriage, could serve on a denominational committee. But the board faced an additional layer of difficulty when the issue became clouded by racial tension, leading one board member to resign.

The board reconfirmed its appointment of Basinger, a member of Seattle Mennonite Church, to the Leadership Discernment Committee. The board had suspended his appointment in June by a vote of 8 to 6. When the board appointed him last spring, most of the members did not know of Basinger’s sexual orientation and marital status. They decided they needed more time to make an informed decision.

On Sept. 30 the board voted 8 to 5 to reconfirm Basinger’s appointment.

Announcing the decision, moderator David Boshart said the board had considered how to manage the tension between differing views on including LGBTQ people in the church while honoring commitments to decisions that delegates have made.

Boshart cited the 2015 forbearance resolution, which calls for accepting differences of belief and practice on sexuality, and the Membership Guidelines, which affirm a traditional position on marriage.

Before the vote to reconfirm Basinger’s appointment, Larry Hauder of Boise, Idaho, resigned from the board. In a written statement, he cited his “central role” in Basinger’s appointment.

“In my attempt to be inclusive and nondiscriminatory, I withheld information about Doug, but in so doing, I inadvertently alienated persons of color who serve on our Board,” Hauder wrote. “I am hopeful that my stepping down will better enable Doug’s appointment to be reinstated and [make space] for necessary, ongoing conversations regarding race and use of power.”

There is no policy on whether sexual orientation or relationship status should effect the selection of churchwide committee members.

After making their decision, board members worked on a plan to prevent a similar situation from happening again and to deal with the fallout from mistakes made this time.

They made a list of commitments, including to develop explicit policies for committee appointments and to address the hurt that resulted from Basinger’s selection.

“The board did an assessment of what hurt has been caused in this process and to whom,” Boshart said, describing the board’s work during closed sessions. “The board has contributed to that hurt and needs to take responsibility and made a commitment to work with larger issues to work toward healing.”

In other business, the board:

  • Received a proposal from the Higher Education Future Church/School Relations Committee. Board members discussed the proposal during an off-the-record session. Details will be made public after the boards of the six MC USA colleges, universities and seminary receive it.
  • Heard an update from the committee that is searching for the denomination’s next executive director. It hopes to recommend a candidate by April. Ervin Stutzman will retire in the spring of 2018.
  • Conducted a review of Everence, the financial stewardship agency that manages $3 billion of assets and serves MC USA, other Anabaptists and other Christians. Everence president and CEO Kenneth D. Hochstetler and board chair Duane Oswald made a presentation.

Paul Schrag is the Editor of Mennonite World Review

The Mennonite, Inc., is currently reviewing its Comments Policy. During this review, commenting on new articles is disabled; readers are encouraged to comment on new articles via The Mennonite’s Facebook page. Comments on older articles can continue to be submitted for review. Comments that were previously approved will still appear on older articles. To promote constructive dialogue, the editors of The Mennonite moderate all comments, and comments don’t appear until approved. Read our full Comments Policy before submitting a comment for approval.

5 Responses to “MC USA Board approves Journey Forward, Appointment of LGBTQ member reaffirmed”

  1. Kurt Horst says:

    The editor of the article on the appointment of an LGBTQ member to the discernment body wrote, “There is no policy on whether sexual orientation or relationship status should affect the selection of churchwide committee members.”
    From the Bylaws of Mennonite Church USA: “The role of Mennonite Church USA is to … (b) establish, teach and promote the core values and beliefs of the church based on Scripture as expressed in the Confession of Faith in a Mennonite Perspective, as updated from time to time.”
    From Article 19 of the above referenced document: “We believe that God intends marriage to be a covenant between one man and and one woman for life.”
    I understood the forbearance statement to call for tolerance of differences in belief and practice at congregational and conference levels within the denomination but that the affirmation of the Membership Guidelines would still guide the denomination.

    • Dave says:

      Kurt, MC USA has plenty of people working in various leadership positions (including the Executive Board) who are divorced, i.e., not married “for life.”
      So are you proposing we should not allow them to serve, given Article 19? Or are you only wanting to enforce a particular interpretation of the COF?
      If you want the church to be clear about who should be excluded, you (or someone) will need to write a clear policy. The COF describes our shared beliefs, values, and aspirations in beautiful ways, but it isn’t a policy document. Even the Membership Guidelines do not speak to this particular question of committee membership.
      I agree that it is a complex question of how forbearance plays out at the denominational level, but if someone is a member in good standing of their congregation and conference, how are denominational leaders to determine whether that person should be allowed to serve at the denominational level? Clearer policy, perhaps?
      Dave Hockman-Wert

      • A church, like Moses, can allow for failure without compromising its moral stand, and that is the distinction regarding divorced persons who are appointees or employees at the denominational level. These divorced individuals no doubt still endorse –or at least they are capable of endorsing –the Article 19 statement that God intends marriage to be a covenant between one man and one woman for life. (And if they don’t believe Article 19, there is a serious question about their fitness to serve.) I am hard pressed to think that Doug Basinger, known to me personally as a thoughtful, decent man, would be able to voice similar agreement with this recognition of God’s intent regarding marriage.
        Can we stop trying to play the unfortunate divorce card to encourage a qualitatively different kind of decline in church discipline and sexuality norms?

        • Richard Worden Wilson says:

          An excellent comment and question. The consequences of divorce and possible remarriage, as it should properly impact leadership roles within the church, are dependent on the particular historical dynamics leading to the divorce–this is not an “all divorced persons are in sin as defined by New Testament teaching” situation as are those engaged in LGBTQ+ sexual relationships. The historical New Testament teaching is not the real question, but whether we as bodies of believers are willing to accept and uphold that teaching. This seems increasingly to be less the case among MC USA persons and congregations.

    • That’s my understanding too, Kurt. Yet some across our church pretend that the forbearance statement and Membership Guidelines are in conflict, and the Executive Board by its silence has enabled this pretense to continue. I support the appointment of Basinger, but I deeply mourn the failure of our MC USA leaders to provide the clarity you offer. Instead, they are playing politics.

Leave a Reply