The Sent Network, containing resources designed to help church planters carry out their mission, will launch on Aug. 29. Three phases — explore, equip and […]
Photo: Luz y Vida worship team leads worship at the Southeast Conference assembly. Photo by Alma Perez Ovalle.
Following a three-year discernment process, delegates of Southeast Mennonite Conference of Mennonite Church USA have voted for the conference to leave the denomination. Southeast Conference’s seven-member Leadership Board brought the proposal to leave MC USA to the conference’s annual assembly, held Oct. 5-6 at Iglesia Cristiana Ebenezer in Apopka, Florida.
Of the 27 delegates present, representing 16 of Southeast Conference’s 25 congregations, 18 voted yes, 8 voted no, and one abstained.
The proposal also directed the conference’s Leadership Board to bring delegates new affiliation options by March 2019.
Southeast becomes the fourth conference to leave MC USA, after Lancaster, Franklin and North Central.
Americus (Georgia) Mennonite Fellowship and Emmanuel Mennonite Church of Gainesville, Florida, are currently exploring transferring to Central District Conference of MC USA. Berea Mennonite Church of Atlanta transferred to Central District earlier this year.
“Am I confident that all congregations that haven’t looked for other affiliations will stay with us? No, I’m not, but my sense is the vast majority will stay with us,” said Michael Zehr, Southeast Conference moderator and a church planter in Key West, Florida, in an Oct. 8 phone interview.
A group appointed by Southeast Conference leadership has spoken with Conservative Mennonite Conference, Evana Network, Fellowship of Evangelical Churches (formerly Evangelical Mennonite Church) and LMC (formerly Lancaster Mennonite Conference), according to an article by Mennonite World Review published in May.
At their March 2017 meeting, Southeast Conference delegates approved four statements, including one that examined the conference’s affiliation with MC USA. Because of the conference’s “shared understandings around the issues of homosexuality,” one of the statements said, the conference would “go on record as planning to leave Mennonite Church USA should the forbearance resolution passed [at the 2015 MC USA convention in Kansas City, Missouri] become a permanent position or practice for the church.”
At the Oct. 5-6 gathering, Glen Guyton, executive director of Mennonite Church USA, and Michael Danner, associate executive director for church vitality and engagement, participated in a question-and-answer session with delegates. Zehr characterized that time as “good and healthy,” in which delegates and pastors asked Guyton and Danner about their vision for the future of MC USA, the Forbearance in the Midst of Differences resolution and how relationships with MC USA churchwide organizations would be impacted by the conference leaving the denomination.
“It’s disappointing when a conference decides to leave MC USA, especially since Glen Guyton and I just started in this work,” Danner said in an Oct. 9 phone interview. “We are excited about the future of MC USA. We were hoping Southeast Conference could join in our journey forward and help shape the direction of the church.”
According to Danner, Guyton asked Zehr whether, because of MC USA leadership changes, the conference would postpone its vote for a year. “The fact that they denied that request is disappointing,” Danner said.
Zehr acknowledged that MC USA leadership transition occurred late in Southeast Conference’s process. Guyton began his role on May 1, and Danner began his role on June 1.
Conference leadership had “many communications” with David Boshart, moderator of MC USA, and Ervin Stutzman, executive director of MC USA for much of Southeast Conference’s discernment process, in addition to Guyton and Danner more recently, Zehr said. “Our conversations were very caring and very respectful. They were not contentious in any way, shape or form. Just as they’re trying to do what’s best for MC USA, we’re trying to do what’s best for Southeast Conference.”
Danner said it seemed like the Southeast Conference leaders and delegates “have a fundamental misunderstanding of the forbearance resolution.”
The resolution, passed by MC USA delegates in July 2015, says, “We acknowledge that there is currently not consensus within Mennonite Church USA on whether it is appropriate to bless Christians who are in same-sex covenanted unions. Because God has called us to seek peace and unity as together we discern and seek wisdom on these matters, we call on all those in Mennonite Church USA to offer grace, love and forbearance toward conferences, congregations and pastors in our body who, in different ways, seek to be faithful to our Lord Jesus Christ on matters related to same-sex covenanted unions.”
Danner said, “First, when is it ever not appropriate to respond with grace, love and forbearance when we disagree on matters of doctrine? Second, the resolution does not state a particular time frame, so when Southeast Conference ties their departure to the permanence of this resolution, they’re understanding things the resolution doesn’t actually say.”
In conversations with MC USA leadership, Zehr said, “We were told was there was no plan to revisit forbearance.”
One assembly participant, according to Danner, asked if some of the Southeast Conference congregations could form a new conference. “We haven’t talked much about that,” Danner said. “We’ll work with any congregation that wants to remain with MC USA.”
Some reports over the past three years have suggested conference leadership was looking for feedback on the topic of women in leadership. Zehr said women in leadership “has not been a contentious issue in Southeast Conference” and that conference leadership “would not consider affiliating with a group that would not credential women.”
People of color comprise the majority of Southeast Conference congregational membership.
“We had significant push from some of our people of color” to leave MC USA, Zehr said. “People of color voted both ways and whites voted both ways. The voting did not go along racial-ethnic lines.”
In terms of accessing MC USA resources, Danner said, “churches on the margins are the ones impacted the most if they are not a part of MC USA anymore.”
Danner cited the Corinthian Plan, the denomination’s health-care plan that subsidizes coverage for low- and moderate-income pastors. Pastors on the Corinthian Plan from Lancaster Mennonite Conference (LMC), which left MC USA but has remained committed to supporting the Corinthian Plan, have been able to continue their coverage, he said, though there is no such plan currently for Southeast Conference pastors.
“I respect persons who discern that, as a matter of faith and conscience, they can no longer remain in MC USA,” Danner said. “At the same time, it lacks integrity, in my view, to separate yourself from MC USA and still retain benefits that come from MC USA ministries and programs, including those of our program agencies. Moving forward, it is important for MC USA to steward our resources wisely as we build up MC USA.”
MC USA agencies such as Mennonite Mission Network and Everence serve congregations and individuals outside of MC USA.
Danner noted that Guyton has committed to leading a process to address human sexuality within MC USA “with the goal of bringing clarity because we’re in this middle space.” MC USA staff will unveil the process at the 2019 MC USA convention in Kansas City, Missouri, and it will conclude with the 2021 convention in Cincinnati.
“As MC USA staff, we’re leading out of our Renewed Commitments, so our focus is not on how we keep people from leaving the denomination,” Danner said. “Our future lies in having healthy congregations and living out the Anabaptist way.”
As of Oct. 9, MC USA has 605 congregations with a total membership of 66,352, including Southeast Conference congregations and members.
The Mennonite, Inc., is currently reviewing its Comments Policy. During this review, commenting on new articles is disabled; readers are encouraged to comment on new articles via The Mennonite’s Facebook page. Comments on older articles can continue to be submitted for review. Comments that were previously approved will still appear on older articles. To promote constructive dialogue, the editors of The Mennonite moderate all comments, and comments don’t appear until approved. Read our full Comments Policy before submitting a comment for approval.