Worship materials created for Mennonite Heritage Sunday with the theme “Lament in response to the Doctrine of Discovery” are now available at mennoniteusa.org/heritage2018. Heritage Sunday […]
David E. Mishler is Conference Minister for Allegheny Mennonite Conference.
When I returned to Allegheny Conference at the call of its Leadership Council in 2016, I knew that the road ahead would be fraught with questions, anger, misunderstanding, lament…and praise and joy, relief and new energy. This anticipated mixture was what drew me and also gave me pause. Enjoying my first pastoral assignment in 23 years in Newport News, Virginia, after a successful tenure developing an interdenominational continuing care retirement community in western Pennsylvania, the congregation I was serving, Huntington Mennonite Church, and I were getting our footing and ministry was happening within and beyond the congregation. I was in a good place and some regional conference work may have been on the horizon.
So why did I decide to accept a call to return to a conference leadership role in a conference that was in deep pain, experiencing some two-thirds of its congregations withdrawing from Mennonite Church USA and Allegheny Conference? Partly because the landscape was familiar.
Allegheny had just come through a significant “reconciliation” process, re-instating Hyattsville (Maryland) Mennonite Church to full membership. The measure to reinstate passed by one vote and the stage was set for announced and unannounced departures by congregations who saw this step as a bridge too far.
Theological and polity concerns were all over the continuum. What once was a conference of 37 congregations would soon be 18 and would later be 12.
When I recently read a report in Mennonite World Review from South Central Conference making provision for congregations to be members of the conference but not members of MC USA, a practice affirmed in Ohio Conference, I wondered if such a practice could have provided a way for long-time relationships to have continued in Allegheny. Should Allegheny adopt such a policy?
But what caught my eye was the last paragraph. A statement that could be read as a prophetic word, or the stating of a position, or both. Outgoing South Central Conference moderator Gary Wolfer said, “As of today, what we have is a forbearance perspective, but there will come a day when that ends.” If this is a word to the rest of the church that patience will likely run out and there will be more division in the denomination, I sadly agree. If it is a position that forbearance is in place for now, but forbearance should be put away in the future, because tolerance or forbearance is not the highest of ideals, and should only be put in place for a season, then I beg to offer a different perspective, a perspective the Apostle Paul called for as a regular, forever practice in the church.
Indeed there is paradox here, holding apparent opposites in tension at the same time: “Stop passing judgment on one another” (14:13). Don’t “put any stumbling block or obstacle in the way of a brother or sister” (14:13). “Do not let what you know is good be spoken of as evil” (14:16). “Make every effort to do what leads to peace” (14:19). “Each of us should please our neighbors for their good, to build them up” (15:2). “Accept one another, then, just as Christ accepted you, in order to bring praise to God” (15:7).
So, as I came to Allegheny, now over a year ago, my goal was to lead a conference who was reeling from the inability of many to forebear into a place where forbearance is forever. My hope is to lead a conference with the greatest diversity we can imagine under the Lordship of Jesus Christ. Loving God and loving neighbor call for no expiration on forbearance.
Allegheny is on a path to discerning its future, and we are staking our future around three priorities as our guiding principles, and we ask all conferences and congregations to consider your approach to forbearance as a call that lasts forever:
The Mennonite, Inc., is currently reviewing its Comments Policy. During this review, commenting on new articles is disabled. Comments that were previously approved will still appear. Comments on older articles can continue to be submitted for review in accordance with the policy below. To promote constructive dialogue, the editors of The Mennonite moderate all comments and comments don’t appear until approved. Anonymous comments are not accepted. Writers must sign posts or log into Disqus with their first and last name. Read our full Comments Policy.